Skip to content
treemarks.ai

How will my work be graded?

Human accountability

A human is responsible for your grade.

Regrades handled fairly

When staff change a rubric decision after one regrade, matching work is checked for the same credit.

Personalized feedback

The report shows which rubric tier you earned and what corrections are needed for full credit.

Feedback you can act on.

ENGR 120 · Engineering Economy
Problem Set 3 — Graded
Sample Student
83 / 100
83%
ProblemScore
P1 · Simple vs. compound interest20 / 20
P2 · Equivalent uniform annual cost16 / 20
P3 · Internal rate of return25 / 25
P4 · Present-worth comparison8 / 10
P5 · Benefit–cost & sensitivity14 / 25
P4 · Present-worth comparison
8 / 10
Rubric
G1 Places the initial cost, annual savings, and terminal salvage with the correct sign and timing 4 / 4
G2 Builds the present-worth comparison from the correct cash flows, but discounts the annual series one payment at a time 4 / 6
How to get full credit Use (P/A, 8%, 8) for the annual series, then add the salvage with (P/F, 8%, 8).
Your work
+3,200/yr +12k −28k
PW = −28,000 + 3,200(P/F,8%,1) + 3,200(P/F,8%,2) + …
↑ each year discounted separately (should be P/A)
+ 12,000(P/F,8%,8)
PW ≈ $1,090
Synthetic example, not a real submission.

Where AI stops.

Treemarks is scoped to quantitative work with course-defined anchors such as equations, units, and boundary conditions. Essays and open-ended interpretation stay with people.

Read the grading commitments.

The Treemarks Standard