Rapid conceptual feedback.
Treemarks uses your course materials to highlight the gap between what a student submitted and what earns full credit. Students see what is missing so they can close the loop.
Feedback before the grade.
Students need feedback while they can still use it. When it arrives a week or more after the deadline, students may already have moved on. Returning feedback with a grade can weaken its benefit.
Your team can share Treemarks’ conceptual feedback without scores, then release grades after review. Students can focus on what to revisit before seeing the mark.
Name the missing concept.
Show what is missing and how to address it.
- The $12,000 arrives in year 8. Bring it to year 0 using 12,000 ÷ 1.08⁸ before adding it to the other present values.
- Course reference: time value of money — single future payment.
See the concept behind the class average.
A total score can hide a shared difficulty. See which concepts need attention, then decide what to revisit with the class or explore in office hours.
Submissions
15 / 17
Mean
94.5 / 100
Median
97 / 100
What needs attention
2 students did not submit.
3 of 15 did not fully explain the learning percentage.
Strength by concept
Learning curve
Q5-Q6 · 20 pts
Decision framing
Q7 · 10 pts
Time value of money
Q2 · 20 pts
Equivalent-life comparison
Q3 · 20 pts
Benefit-cost and externalities
Q4 · 30 pts
Start with one assignment.
Bring your course materials and a staff reviewer. See the feedback on work you know.
See what we have tested, what the results mean, and what still needs to be checked.